I'd like to second André's points. I initially started programming gtkmm and sigc++ a few years ago. When I switched to Qt, my life suddenly became so much easier with the best documentation and clear and consistent API. I can now quickly develop applications and, as Bo said, the toolkit gets out of my way.
It also has very good addon library support such as Qwt, qextserialport, libqxt, and more, many of which follow similar APIs as Qt main. Qwt in particular has saved me so many headaches. Sincerely, Chris On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Andre Somers <an...@familiesomers.nl> wrote: > Op 26-3-2012 23:24, Quim Gil schreef: >> Hi, >> >> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-is-Good >> >> Please help creating a list of points explaining why Qt is good compared >> to other alternatives for application developers. >> >> Let’s focus on specifics: contrastable proof points and experiences from >> developers working in different platforms are greatly appreciated. >> >> You can reply here or edit directly the wiki. In any keep I'll do my >> best keeping all the relevant information in the wiki page. >> >> Thank you! > The two main points are for me: > * The documentation is clearly best-of-breed, and > * The API's are generally clear and consistent, making the framework > easy to learn and predictable > > As a bonus: it has a great community around it! :-) > > André > >> -- >> Quim >> _______________________________________________ >> Interest mailing list >> Interest@qt-project.org >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
