On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 07:51:35PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>  static void intel_edp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
>               container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), psr.work.work);
> -     struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
>       struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled;
>  
> -     drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
> -     mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>       mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>       intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled;
>  
>       if (!intel_dp)
>               goto unlock;
>  
> -     if (intel_edp_psr_match_conditions(intel_dp))
> -             intel_edp_psr_do_enable(intel_dp);
> +     if (dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)
> +             goto unlock;

Hmm, I requeued the work item out of paranoia. But I think a comment
here about how invalidate *will* be called again if any of the
busy_frontbuffer_bits change and so the work will be requeued on the
next update.

> +
> +     intel_edp_psr_do_enable(intel_dp);
>  unlock:
>       mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> -     mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -     drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
>  }
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to