On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 03:55:39PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> The bspec has just recently been updated with new cdclk values that
> require the use of a /2 CD2X divider rather than a /1 divider.  Once we
> add the divider selection logic to ICL+ cdclk programming, we have
> pretty much the same logic we were already using on CNL, so it's simpler
> to drop icl_set_cdclk() completely and reuse cnl_set_cdclk() on gen11+
> platforms as well.
> 
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <[email protected]>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 90 +++++++++-------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h            |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 939088c7d814..a56ccd0930e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1659,10 +1659,23 @@ static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>               cnl_cdclk_pll_enable(dev_priv, vco);
>  
>       val = divider | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk);
> -     if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
> -             val |= BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE;
> -     else
> -             val |= BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe);
> +
> +     if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> +             if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
> +                     val |= ICL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE;
> +             else
> +                     val |= BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe);

Hmm. So the mess made here with icl is now fixed. Cool. Sad they
didn't fix it on icl as well.

However I have a feeling this may end up confusing people, so maybe we
should just add TGL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE()?

> +     } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> +             if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
> +                     val |= ICL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE;
> +             else
> +                     val |= ICL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe);
> +     } else {
> +             if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
> +                     val |= BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE;
> +             else
> +                     val |= BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe);
> +     }
>       I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val);
>  
>       if (pipe != INVALID_PIPE)
> @@ -1813,51 +1826,6 @@ static int icl_calc_cdclk_pll_vco(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int cdclk)
>       return dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref * ratio;
>  }
>  
> -static void icl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> -                       const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state,
> -                       enum pipe pipe)
> -{
> -     unsigned int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
> -     unsigned int vco = cdclk_state->vco;
> -     int ret;
> -
> -     ret = skl_pcode_request(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> -                             SKL_CDCLK_PREPARE_FOR_CHANGE,
> -                             SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
> -                             SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
> -     if (ret) {
> -             DRM_ERROR("Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (%d)\n",
> -                       ret);
> -             return;
> -     }
> -
> -     if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != 0 &&
> -         dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> -             cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(dev_priv);
> -
> -     if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> -             cnl_cdclk_pll_enable(dev_priv, vco);
> -
> -     /*
> -      * On ICL CD2X_DIV can only be 1, so we'll never end up changing the
> -      * divider here synchronized to a pipe while CDCLK is on, nor will we
> -      * need the corresponding vblank wait.
> -      */
> -     I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, ICL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE |
> -                           skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk));
> -
> -     sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> -                             cdclk_state->voltage_level);
> -
> -     intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
> -
> -     /*
> -      * Can't read out the voltage level :(
> -      * Let's just assume everything is as expected.
> -      */
> -     dev_priv->cdclk.hw.voltage_level = cdclk_state->voltage_level;
> -}
> -
>  static u8 icl_calc_voltage_level(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int 
> cdclk)
>  {
>       if (IS_ELKHARTLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> @@ -1881,6 +1849,7 @@ static void icl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>                         struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
>  {
>       u32 val;
> +     int div;
>  
>       cdclk_state->bypass = 50000;
>  
> @@ -1914,10 +1883,21 @@ static void icl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>  
>       cdclk_state->vco = (val & BXT_DE_PLL_RATIO_MASK) * cdclk_state->ref;
>  
> -     val = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
> -     WARN_ON((val & BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK) != 0);
> +     val = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL) & BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK;
> +     switch (val) {
> +     case BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1:
> +             div = 2;
> +             break;
> +     case BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_2:
> +             div = 4;
> +             break;
> +     default:
> +             MISSING_CASE(val);
> +             div = 2;
> +             break;
> +     }
>  
> -     cdclk_state->cdclk = cdclk_state->vco / 2;
> +     cdclk_state->cdclk = cdclk_state->vco / div;

cnl uses DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(). In general this function looks rather
different to cnl_get_cdclk() even though the actual differences are
minimal. Some unification of style might be nice. Not sure if reusing
the cnl function on icl might actually make sense. Would require
a few ifs.

>  
>  out:
>       /*
> @@ -1963,7 +1943,7 @@ static void icl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>                               icl_calc_voltage_level(dev_priv,
>                                                      sanitized_state.cdclk);
>  
> -     icl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &sanitized_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> +     cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &sanitized_state, INVALID_PIPE);
>  }
>  
>  static void icl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -1975,7 +1955,7 @@ static void icl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>       cdclk_state.voltage_level = icl_calc_voltage_level(dev_priv,
>                                                          cdclk_state.cdclk);
>  
> -     icl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> +     cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state, INVALID_PIPE);
>  }
>  
>  static void cnl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -2810,7 +2790,7 @@ void intel_update_rawclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>  void intel_init_cdclk_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> -             dev_priv->display.set_cdclk = icl_set_cdclk;
> +             dev_priv->display.set_cdclk = cnl_set_cdclk;
>               dev_priv->display.modeset_calc_cdclk = icl_modeset_calc_cdclk;
>       } else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) {
>               dev_priv->display.set_cdclk = cnl_set_cdclk;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index a142aa3d74e3..958dfdfb4e10 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -9671,6 +9671,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>  #define  BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe)   ((pipe) << 20)
>  #define  CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE    (1 << 19)
>  #define  BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE    BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(3)
> +#define  ICL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe)   (_PICK(pipe, 0, 2, 6) << 19)

Could also do eg.
((((pipe) << 1) | ((pipe) & ~1)) << 19)

if we want to avoid the _PICK(). Doesn't really matter I suppose.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

>  #define  ICL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE    (7 << 19)
>  #define  BXT_CDCLK_SSA_PRECHARGE_ENABLE      (1 << 16)
>  #define  CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK     (0x7ff)
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to