On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:51:11 -0700, Ben Widawsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:03:07 -0700 > Eric Anholt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:47:22 -0700, Ben Widawsky <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Assertion + unsigned helps catch potential issues. > > > > > > From the docs it is hard to tell if the global GTT flag is actually > > > needed, but it shouldn't hurt. > > > > We're updating a register, not the GTT, so I don't see why the flag > > would be relevant. > > The patch is as (ir)relevant as without it which implies PPGTT. The > reason it was there is in another branch I was planning to implement > memory based semaphores.
Memory based semaphores required working ppgtt, afaict. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
