On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:03:07 -0700 Eric Anholt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:47:22 -0700, Ben Widawsky <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Assertion + unsigned helps catch potential issues. > > > > From the docs it is hard to tell if the global GTT flag is actually > > needed, but it shouldn't hurt. > > We're updating a register, not the GTT, so I don't see why the flag > would be relevant. The patch is as (ir)relevant as without it which implies PPGTT. The reason it was there is in another branch I was planning to implement memory based semaphores. I have the refactor patch coming soon, should probably ignore this. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
