On Sun, 15 May 2011 22:49:02 +0200, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote:

> I actually like this: I saves one needless indirection when reading
> codepaths and trying to find out what code is run for a given pci id.
> Also, these two bits seem to be the only ones that are used in only _one_
> device type, which is a bit confusing.

Yeah, we've got a bunch of single-bits per display generation; should we
create one of those for broadwater+crestline? That combination is used a
couple of times in the driver.

Thanks for your comments; I'll take this patch and we can consider
whether to add a bit for crestline+broadwater later.

-- 
[email protected]

Attachment: pgpD900Sl7elm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to