Igor Brezac wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, John Fawcett wrote: >> >>> Anyone know whether a patch for cyrus to strip out nuls would be >>> welcome? >> >> >> Make it clean, and optional (as in either reject the message, or >> remove the >> NULs...), and I don't see why not. The default would need to be reject, >> though. > > oops I replied to the last mail without seeing these follow-ups.
> I think we are saying the same thing: the current behaviour needs to be > default. > I personaly think that this filtering belongs in MTA. intervening in cyrus just means having a solution to a limit imposed by cyrus (or imap) regardless of the MTA in use. I think there is little interest in patching MTAs. I imagine that not every delivery agent/message store will reject NULs so there is no need for the MTA to strip them out. John > >> But we really need to do something about the also non-RFC compliant crap >> that sends too-big lines as well, cyrus screws up when breaking those >> lines. >> Is that bug completely fixed yet? >> > > This bug is still not fixed. ;-( > --- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
