Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:56:07 -0500
   From: Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
   Sooo... any reason why the docs aren't sgml and then built for text,
   html, ps, etc? Think of this as less of a request and more of 'would
   CMU be interested' type question. :)

No objections, but it's one of those things of "is it worth creating
more dependencies" versus the current very simple htmlstrip and html
files.

At one point I converted some of the files to XHTML and that process
will probably continue slowly. If someone has a good idea of how to
make the documentation easier to deal with, we're all for it.

Larry

Reply via email to