On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:37:50AM -0500, Rob Siemborski wrote: > On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Rob Siemborski wrote: > > > I'll look into what's going on, but the HTML version is correct. > I've fixed both of these issues. You can pull an updated source for > htmlstrip.c from cvs now, but since the documentation is still complete in > its authoritative format (HTML), I don't think this justifies an immediate > rerelease.
No, I would tend to agree. I'm just a text fan and happen to notice it while diffing the releases. Sooo... any reason why the docs aren't sgml and then built for text, html, ps, etc? Think of this as less of a request and more of 'would CMU be interested' type question. :) -- Scott Russell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Linux Technology Center, System Admin, RHCE. Dial 877-735-8200 then ask for 919-543-9289 (TTY)
