On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 23:27:10 -0500
Scott Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott M Likens wrote:
>
> > This is quite Sickening, RBL is a MTA implementation not needed to be
> > done via Sieve, and as for spamassasin you can always write decent
> > header checks and body checks for postfix to use. I am sure there is
> > the same option in sendmail.
>
>
> If you have some idea how I could accomplish my stated goals on the MTA
> side, please share. I've given my reasons for this approach. Why do you
> feel so strongly that this belongs in the MTA?
>
> Here's one I haven't mentioned yet - some people want to do 'fileinto
> "INBOX.spam"' instead of outright blocking spams. With something purely
> on the MTA side, this isn't possible at all - Cyrus is what decides
> where the mail gets filed. This is possible with the X-RBL-Warning, but
> I've pretty thoroughly stated why I think that's inadequate. I won't
> repeat myself.
>
> --
> Scott Lamb
I'm using postfix and I do this with procmail for each user, which
launch a wrapper for cyrdeliver, something like that:
DELIVER="/user/usr/bin/cyrus-deliver-wrapper"
SPAMASSASIN_EXITCODE=`spamc -c > /dev/null`
:0 H
* test $SPAMASSASIN_EXITCODE
{
| spamc | $DELIVER Spam
}
Alain
