Joe Rhett wrote:
> > The main point of this is to actually get some virtual hosting within a
> > single mailstore. The use_ip_as_realm patch will provide most of the
> > changes needed to do either named or ip vhosts, primarily how
> > information (mailboxes, acls, message flags, etc) is seperated across
> > realms so you can have bob@realm1 and bob@realm2 who are different
> > users.
>
> Changing the realm won't resolve name conflicts within the message store.
>
Currently, I'm thinking of creating multiple trees under /var/spool/imap
for the multiple virtual hosts. i.e. /var/spool/imap/ and
/var/spool/imap/.realm2/ will be parallel mailstores for the different
realms (This seems the least intrusive way to do it). Sorry I didn't
explicitly mention that earlier.
--
Todd Nemanich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Protecting the opulent and staging moral standard,
They expect redemption of character and self growth"
Bad Religion - Inner Logic
