> > The best way is to have the client log into a single hostname with a single
> > IP (and single matching certificate) but provide domain information during
> > the login.
>
> This is indeed a better idea, which already has been discussed. My
> opinion is that the server should have the option to implicitly set it's
> realm information, since you don't always have the information you need
> from the client to set the realm. If you don't like it, don't use it. :)
> The main point of this is to actually get some virtual hosting within a
> single mailstore. The use_ip_as_realm patch will provide most of the
> changes needed to do either named or ip vhosts, primarily how
> information (mailboxes, acls, message flags, etc) is seperated across
> realms so you can have bob@realm1 and bob@realm2 who are different
> users.
Changing the realm won't resolve name conflicts within the message store.
--
Joe Rhett Chief Technology Officer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ISite Services, Inc.
PGP keys and contact information: http://www.noc.isite.net/Staff/
