On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Rob Tanner wrote: > privileges. Since all the mailboxes are owned by the Cyrus user, what > would be more secure of a system that just does mail delivery woulkd > be a hack to sendmail so that once it attaches to port 25 it drops root > and runs as the Cyrus user. Show me a hack like that, and Cyrus wins > hands down (or two thumbs up) because you can't do that with UofW. Is there any reason you can't just use ``RunAsUser'' and run as cyrus? I run machine that do no local delivery as arbitrary users, and that works just fine. ian
- Security of Cyrus IMAPd vs UofW IMAPd ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Security of Cyrus IMAPd vs UofW IMAPd ... Rob Tanner
- Re: Security of Cyrus IMAPd vs UofW IMAPd ... Werner Reisberger
- Re: Security of Cyrus IMAPd vs UofW IMAPd ... Amos Gouaux
- Re: Security of Cyrus IMAPd vs UofW IMAPd ... John Hughes
- Re: Security of Cyrus IMAPd vs UofW IMAPd ... Scott Smith
- Re: Security of Cyrus IMAPd vs UofW IMAPd ... Bitt Faulk
- Re: Security of Cyrus IMAPd vs UofW IMAPd ... Scott Smith
- Re: Security of Cyrus IMAPd vs UofW IMAPd ... patl
- Re: Security of Cyrus IMAPd vs UofW IMAPd ... Scott Smith
- RE: Security of Cyrus IMAPd vs UofW IMAPd ... Ian G Batten
- RE: Security of Cyrus IMAPd vs UofW IMAPd ... John Hughes