On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:43:59AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Larry Greenfield writes: > > > >This sort of directory hash is very easy to implement in Cyrus; a > >better directory hash than the one included wasn't chosen since we > >wanted something simple that worked well enough for us. This reminds me: I wondered why Cyrus hashes directories and not mail files (ie inside a mailbox, every message seems to be in the mailbox's dir). Is that configurable and I missed the options ? Stephane
- Better directory hashing for cyrus-imapd-2.0.x mills
- Re: Better directory hashing for cyrus-imapd-2.0.... Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: Better directory hashing for cyrus-imapd-2.0.... mills
- Re: Better directory hashing for cyrus-imapd-... Stephane Enten
- Re: Better directory hashing for cyrus-im... Lawrence Greenfield