>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:58:58 -0500, >>>>> Lawrence Greenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (lg) writes: lg> This is exactly the problem. A future version of Cyrus SASL will lg> probably discontinue the PAM password method is favor of forcing lg> people to use pwcheck. Then what about things you could have in PAM, such as pam_ldap? Wouldn't it be a bit extreme to throw out the PAM support just because of this one case? Perhaps if configure enables PAM support, it could print a warning message that for local passwd/shadow access, pwcheck should be used? -- Amos
- Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users accept the cyrus password ... Andy Hubbell, Jr.
- Re: Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users accept the cyrus ... Andy Hubbell, Jr.
- Re: Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users accept the cyrus ... David L. Parsley
- Re: Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users accept the cy... Todd Nemanich
- Re: Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users accept th... Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users accep... Ken Murchison
- Re: Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users ... Walter Wong
- RE: Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users ... Mobeen Azhar
- Re: Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users accep... Ilya
- Re: Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users accep... Amos Gouaux
- Re: Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users accep... David L. Parsley
- Re: Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users ... Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users accept th... GOMBAS Gabor
- Re: Cyrus-imapd 2.0.9 all users accep... Ross Golder