I think it is pretty cool as well. But I think there is a problem with viewing it as a wildcard.
let's say we define the following: (??) = flip foo :: a -> b -> c foo ?? x :: a -> c Perfect! But saying ?? can be used as a wildcard might in the following wrong perception: foo x ?? :: b -> c -- WRONG Just a small concern. Other than that, very neat! On 26 July 2010 21:42, Nils <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26.07.2010 08:33, David Virebayre wrote: > >> listeEtagTot = concatMap (`listeEtagArm` cfgTypesTringle) listeArmOrd >> > > You can use flip as a "wildcard" aswell: > > > listeEtagTot = concatMap (listeEtagArm `flip` cfgTypesTringle) > listeArmOrd > > Makes it even more readable in my opinion, since this really "shows" you > where the value belongs to. > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > -- Ozgur Akgun
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
