It seems confusing to alias a function without adding any functionality just to make things slightly easier to read. Instead wouldn't it be better if this idiom were documented on haskell.org?
-deech On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Vo Minh Thu <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/7/26 Vo Minh Thu <[email protected]>: > > 2010/7/26 Daniel Fischer <[email protected]>: > >> On Monday 26 July 2010 23:25:27, Max Rabkin wrote: > >>> > >>> It took me a fair while (I'm talking on the order of half a minute) to > >>> figure out what that meant, but it's pretty cool. > >> > >> Yeah, really neat. > >> > >>> Maybe a different > >>> name would be better? How about (??) or "it"? > >>> > >>> > listeEtagTot = concatMap (listeEtagArm ?? cfgTypesTringle) > listeArmOrd > >>> > listeEtagTot = concatMap (listeEtagArm `it` cfgTypesTringle) > >>> > listeArmOrd > >> > >> I think (??) is far better. > >> Additionally, it doesn't run into problems with ghci's magical `it'. > > > > (__) is quite good :) > > Well, I meant `__` > > Cheers, > Thu > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
