On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 5:33 AM Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> wrote: > > Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 21:33:00 +0100 > > From: Richard Wordingham <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 21:15:04 +0300 > > Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:13:25 +0100 > > > > From: Richard Wordingham <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > I think it's safe to specify the use of unsupported features, in > > > > which case this is a luxury feature. > > > > > > you mean, specifying an unsupported feature will not cause hb_shape to > > > fail, but instead just use the nominal glyphs? > > > > Essentially yes, i.e. unsupported features will simply be ignored. > > Then there's no need to know whether a feature is supported. Thanks. >
MS Word for example shows a preview for each support ssXX feature, and user can select one they want. I don't know how (or why) you plan to use that for emacs, but you'll need to have some logic to figure out which one to enable. > > > > Emacs currently leaves it to HarfBuzz to guess the language, so I > > > don't think this is an issue. > > > > Does HarfBuzz guess the language? > > Yes. > _______________________________________________ > HarfBuzz mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
_______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
