> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 21:33:00 +0100 > From: Richard Wordingham <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > > On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 21:15:04 +0300 > Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:13:25 +0100 > > > From: Richard Wordingham <[email protected]> > > > > > > I think it's safe to specify the use of unsupported features, in > > > which case this is a luxury feature. > > > > you mean, specifying an unsupported feature will not cause hb_shape to > > fail, but instead just use the nominal glyphs? > > Essentially yes, i.e. unsupported features will simply be ignored.
Then there's no need to know whether a feature is supported. Thanks. > > Emacs currently leaves it to HarfBuzz to guess the language, so I > > don't think this is an issue. > > Does HarfBuzz guess the language? Yes. _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
