On 07/25/2012 06:14 PM, Jonathan Kew wrote: > On 25/7/12 22:13, Khaled Hosny wrote: >> This only applies to the marks that result of multiple substitution i.e. >> in Amiri the middle lam of لله is substituted with >> <lam><shadda><smallalef>, I don’t think Arabic Typesetting has something >> like that. >> > > Just wondering (without checking the code yet...) - is it possible that we're > failing to set the glyph category from GDEF properly for marks that are > inserted by GSUB rules like this, and as a result the GPOS lookups don't match > as expected?
No, I think I know where the problem is. It's somewhere in the lig_id / lig_comp matching code... Lemme see. b _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
