On 25/7/12 22:13, Khaled Hosny wrote:
This only applies to the marks that result of multiple substitution i.e. in Amiri the middle lam of لله is substituted with <lam><shadda><smallalef>, I don’t think Arabic Typesetting has something like that.
Just wondering (without checking the code yet...) - is it possible that we're failing to set the glyph category from GDEF properly for marks that are inserted by GSUB rules like this, and as a result the GPOS lookups don't match as expected?
_______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
