I wonder if there is a manufacturing/consistency issue? I find my HackRF to be at least as sensitive as my RTL dongles.
Rich On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Tom N <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Stefan, > > Just needed to confirm this with others. > > Completely understand that they are two different devices built on > different hardware etc.. etc.. but at the end of the day receive > performance is the one thing that really counts when using SDR and if i can > barley pick up a community radio station on 151mhz that is only 10km away > from me using the hackrf with the ant500 but the signal screams in using > the $12 dongle and the same antenna then that's not on. > > If Mike ever considers a HackrfTWO please put receiver sensitivity/SNR at > the top of your priority. > > Cheers > > ------------------------------ > Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:16:05 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] Sensitivity > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > Yes, big time! > > Stefan > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Tom N <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am I correct in saying that a rtl dongle is more sensitive then the hackrf? > > I have done many tests with different software, sdr#, gqrx, sdr console > and have tried every different gain setting, samplerates, bands, but my > conclusion is that the SNR is better on the dongle. > > Can other members please confirm their findings comparing the two? > > _______________________________________________ > HackRF-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > HackRF-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev > >
_______________________________________________ HackRF-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
