You may consider a preamplifier (for example
http://www.g4ddk.com/PGA103+2.pdf).
From my point of view Hackrf is not a RX.
It was always presented as short range device, either for receiving or
transmitting.
Rgds
Marc
Le 02/04/2015 05:08, Tom N a écrit :
Thanks Stefan,
Just needed to confirm this with others.
Completely understand that they are two different devices built on
different hardware etc.. etc.. but at the end of the day receive
performance is the one thing that really counts when using SDR and if
i can barley pick up a community radio station on 151mhz that is only
10km away from me using the hackrf with the ant500 but the signal
screams in using the $12 dongle and the same antenna then that's not on.
If Mike ever considers a HackrfTWO please put receiver sensitivity/SNR
at the top of your priority.
Cheers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:16:05 -0500
Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] Sensitivity
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Yes, big time!
Stefan
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Tom N <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Am I correct in saying that a rtl dongle is more sensitive then
the hackrf?
I have done many tests with different software, sdr#, gqrx, sdr
console and have tried every different gain setting, samplerates,
bands, but my conclusion is that the SNR is better on the dongle.
Can other members please confirm their findings comparing the two?
_______________________________________________
HackRF-dev mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
_______________________________________________
HackRF-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
_______________________________________________
HackRF-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
