Karl, Do you have any documentation for your process to build them? (I assume you used visual studios or somesuch? I saw the .lib extensions ib that folder and figured it was natively built) Excuse my ignorance as I'm a Unix guy and really have no idea on windows building, but would like to build from source against the gnuradio from ettus.
-Don On Mar 8, 2015 7:30 PM, "Karl Koscher" <[email protected]> wrote: > Here are some pre-built binaries I made back in late August/early > September. They should work with Ettus's binary release of GNU Radio ( > http://files.ettus.com/binaries/gnuradio/gnuradio_v3.7.2.2/gnuradio_3.7.2.2_Win32.exe), > or you can build GNU Radio with MinGW: > http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki/MingwInstallMain > > https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~supersat/gr-osmosdr.zip > https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~supersat/hackrf-tools-cpld-update-hack.zip > > The hackrf tools build includes a hack to make the CPLD update work under > Windows, but should otherwise be identical to the standard 2014.08 version. > > To get the HackRF to work under GNU Radio on Windows, simply extract > gr-osmosdr.zip into your GNU Radio installation directory and copy > hackrf.dll and libusb-1.0.dll from hackrf-tools to your GNU Radio binary > directory. > > > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:35 AM, steve smith <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> What's missing in Windows?? A key component, actually. There is nothing >> for transmitting in Windows. SDR# is a great tool for receiving, though. >> I agree with you on that one. I do agree that the antenna is most likely >> his problem with images though. What kind of command line tools to do you >> have for gnuradio? >> >> Steve >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: [email protected] >> Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 21:04:38 -0800 >> To: [email protected] >> CC: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] Hack RF Hardware Enhancement >> >> What's missing on Windows? I use my HackRF with Windows, and aside from >> SDR#, I can also use it with GNU Radio. I also have the command line tools >> built if you'd like them. >> >> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 12:22 PM, MV Elttba <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello Group >> I like to see a Widows user tools. It appears that the HackRF is really >> geared for Linux user. My 6 months old HackRF sits in the box it came in. >> Even though I have used my HackRF with Simon's great software SDR Console, >> it has so many images that it unusable. I have dongles that do the same, >> but they only cost $10 -$25. I hope you consider us Window users. >> >> Vincent >> >> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Tony Hagen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Dear HackRF users, >> >> I was wandering whether the hardware of hackrf can be taken into next >> level. >> >> Please post your wish list by this time you have realized what else >> minimum should have been there in the HackRF hardware. >> I am planning to redesign it with its enhancement capability. Probably, >> we can collaborate too technically. >> >> Requesting all HackRF users Post in the forum or write to me off the list >> >> Regards >> Tony >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HackRF-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HackRF-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ HackRF-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > HackRF-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev > >
_______________________________________________ HackRF-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
