One thing I noticed is you don't see the legs or shoes of the older girl.  
Is that just a matter of the shadows or was it touched up somehow.
 
Chris Perri
 
 
 
In a message dated 1/15/2015 3:36:47 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
mae...@gmail.com writes:

Well, it  looks like we have 3 votes for post-mortem and 2 for not. This is
so very  interesting!! Thank you for this topic, Penny. :)

Someone said  something like "Ask yourselves, if the question hadn't been
asked, would we  be seeing so much evidence of death?"

No, we wouldn't but that has  little to do with this photograph. We wouldn't
question it because we would  just assume life. This practice of posed
family photos with the deceased  hasn't been done in so long that it's
totally foreign to us. For us, it's  something you just don't do.

Mourning brooches fall into the same  unsettling category. Now, if someone
walked around wearing a piece of  jewelry made out of their dead friend or
family member's hair, people would  find it (and the mental state of the
person who did so) truly alarming.  Keepsakes are acceptable. Pieces from
someone's body, not so  much.

That, and if the photographer did a good job, we shouldn't  notice. These
days, we do the same thing but it's not a photographer who  does it. The
deceased are made up to look beautiful for viewing, so they  don't "look"
dead. So I can't say I agree with the comment that death has a  certain look
and he doesn't have it. When the qualities are obscured with  make up and
there's no sign of serious trauma, what does death look like?  One can only
go by the eyes, right?

Please guys, let's keep this  discussion scholarly. :)

Now, back to Herbie. His right eye fell inward  and had probably been like
since infancy, which would make him left eye  dominant. But while all the
others are looking where they should, his left  eye (the one that should be
focused) seems lost and empty of life.  Blindness is a possibility but when
the look of the eye is coupled with  other elements in the photograph, I
still have to keep my vote on the  post-mortem side.

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Beteena Paradise  <
bete...@mostlymedieval.com> wrote:

> Actually, I was not  reading into it. I was not stating that the children
> were being yelled  at. I was simply giving several possible alternative
> reasons for their  facial expressions that did not include being upset 
that
> someone was  dead. My point being that you can't assume that the child in
> the photo  is dead because of the facial expressions of the other 
children.
> And  had the PM or not question not been asked, I doubt it would have been
>  assumed that they were mourning simply based on facial expression.
>  This seems to happen every time the PM or not is asked about a photo.
>  Thanatos archive posts these quite often. And every time there are  
several
> people who suddenly see things in the photo that they would  not have seen
> if the question was not asked. For example, the baby has  to be dead 
because
> the mother looks so sad and she is wearing black.  The mother could have
> been wearing any color that photographed as  dark. The facial expression 
was
> blank which was not that uncommon for  that type of photograph (these are
> the ones you have to sit very still  for). And even when specifics are 
given
> as to why the outfit would  absolutely not be mourning (trims, fabrics,
> styles, etc), people only  see death because that is what they are looking
> for.
>  Personally, I like to look at anatomy. We can only guess at emotion,  but
> we scientifically know what happens to a body after death.
>  Teena
>       From: Jacqueline Johnson  <jacqueline.m.john...@gmail.com>
>  To: Historical Costume  <h-cost...@indra.com>
>  Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015  2:19 PM
>  Subject: Re: [h-cost] New Topic: Is this a Postmortem  Photo
>
> Of course a lot is being read into it. That's why we  have this list is it
> not? After all, you just read a lot into  yourself, the idea of the kids
> being yelled at...you're right, we  can't "know". But we can conjecture.
> About  history.
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> h-costume mailing  list
> h-costume@mail.indra.com
>  http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>
_______________________________________________
h-costume  mailing  list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to