Mmm, I’d like to give this a try and get a little dirty with infrastructure 
stuff.

On 13 Apr 2014, at 10:17, Kjell Ahlstedt <kjell.ahlst...@bredband.net> wrote:

> 
> 2014-04-12 20:35, Murray Cumming skrev:
>> On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 19:16 +0200, Juan Rafael García Blanco wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I’ve observed that subclasses of Gtk::Container tend to declare properties 
>>> on their children. In the gtkmm source code I’ve read that they are used 
>>> for theming so that there is no point in wrapping them. Does this currently 
>>> hold?
>>> 
>> Probably not.
>> 
>> 
>>>  IMO there is no such difference between properties and child properties.
>>> 
>> A child property is just a property of a container's child, such as it's
>> alignment or whether it should expand, I think. I'm sure they are
>> useful, if we can find a nice API for it. But it might not be necessary
>> to use the generic property API. Maybe all the functions do what we need
>> already. I don't know.
>> 
>> 
> See also this 10 year old bug report: 
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140515
> 

_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
gtkmm-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list

Reply via email to