Mmm, I’d like to give this a try and get a little dirty with infrastructure stuff.
On 13 Apr 2014, at 10:17, Kjell Ahlstedt <kjell.ahlst...@bredband.net> wrote: > > 2014-04-12 20:35, Murray Cumming skrev: >> On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 19:16 +0200, Juan Rafael García Blanco wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I’ve observed that subclasses of Gtk::Container tend to declare properties >>> on their children. In the gtkmm source code I’ve read that they are used >>> for theming so that there is no point in wrapping them. Does this currently >>> hold? >>> >> Probably not. >> >> >>> IMO there is no such difference between properties and child properties. >>> >> A child property is just a property of a container's child, such as it's >> alignment or whether it should expand, I think. I'm sure they are >> useful, if we can find a nice API for it. But it might not be necessary >> to use the generic property API. Maybe all the functions do what we need >> already. I don't know. >> >> > See also this 10 year old bug report: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140515 > _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
