On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 19:16 +0200, Juan Rafael García Blanco wrote: > Hi, > > I’ve observed that subclasses of Gtk::Container tend to declare properties on > their children. In the gtkmm source code I’ve read that they are used for > theming so that there is no point in wrapping them. Does this currently hold?
Probably not. > IMO there is no such difference between properties and child properties. A child property is just a property of a container's child, such as it's alignment or whether it should expand, I think. I'm sure they are useful, if we can find a nice API for it. But it might not be necessary to use the generic property API. Maybe all the functions do what we need already. I don't know. -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list