Hi, On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:47 PM, fr33domlover <fr33domlo...@mailoo.org>wrote:
> Hello, > > On ב', 2014-01-27 at 17:24 +0100, Giuseppe Penone wrote: > > Hi, I wonder why we cannot add the support for operator + like in > QString, > > it is so > > incredible useful. > > Murray answered that. > > > > > One more thing, after a request I spent time to create the windows gtkmm > > binaries based on official 3.6.4 bundle and provided a link to my > > successful work but then I received no feedback, did I just waste my > time? > > Well if the (only) effort to create gtkmm binaries is ignored, even if > > coming from a donkey, I don't see much future for gtkmm. > > I do think some people here use gtkmm on Window$, judging by the mail > sent to the various mailing lists regarding Window$ builds. > > But I mus say this has nothing to do with the future of gtkmm. Many > people use gtkmm on GNU/Linux and they can use it a lot even if the > usage on Window$ dies. For example, I use gtkmm for all my desktop GUIs > written in C++, and I'm not planning to stop using it, but I don't use > Window$ at all so I'm not interested in the Window$ build. > I'm not a windows fan too but I think that being able to use the same code/libraries on different operative systems is an incredible advantage. > Anyway, I hope you get the feedback you expect. And thanks for writing > CherryTree, by the way! I used to use it a lot. > I'm always so happy to hear somebody using it, thank you :) You see also in cherrytree it is very very important that it is available also on windows to have the generated document readable also there. > > > > > Regards, > > Giuseppe. > > -- fr33 > > > _______________________________________________ > > gtkmm-list mailing list > > gtkmm-list@gnome.org > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list > > >
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
