Hello, On ב', 2014-01-27 at 17:24 +0100, Giuseppe Penone wrote: > Hi, I wonder why we cannot add the support for operator + like in QString, > it is so > incredible useful.
Murray answered that. > > One more thing, after a request I spent time to create the windows gtkmm > binaries based on official 3.6.4 bundle and provided a link to my > successful work but then I received no feedback, did I just waste my time? > Well if the (only) effort to create gtkmm binaries is ignored, even if > coming from a donkey, I don't see much future for gtkmm. I do think some people here use gtkmm on Window$, judging by the mail sent to the various mailing lists regarding Window$ builds. But I mus say this has nothing to do with the future of gtkmm. Many people use gtkmm on GNU/Linux and they can use it a lot even if the usage on Window$ dies. For example, I use gtkmm for all my desktop GUIs written in C++, and I'm not planning to stop using it, but I don't use Window$ at all so I'm not interested in the Window$ build. Anyway, I hope you get the feedback you expect. And thanks for writing CherryTree, by the way! I used to use it a lot. > > Regards, > Giuseppe. -- fr33 > _______________________________________________ > gtkmm-list mailing list > gtkmm-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
