Sorry for the noise. 1) is for the Treeview to access the treemodel 2) is for the treemodel to access the data
eric jrdn2 wrote: > Hi all, > i'm building a treeview on a custom treemodel based on std::vector. > My wish is to build it without knowing the number and the type of the > treecolumns at build time. > I decided to come back to more fondamental widgets to do it, i.e. > implementing this with cellrenderers. > My question is this one. I don't know if i give you enough informations > to have an answer. Sorry for my misunderstanding. I'm lost in the > documentation. > > Why does the data access must be implemented in two methods? > > 1) > m_TreeviewColum.set_cell_data_func(m_CellRendererText,sigc::mem_fun(*this,&class::access)); > for each CellRenderer to access the data > > > and > 2) virtual void get_value_vfunc(const TreeModel::iterator& iter, int > column, Glib::ValueBase& value) const; > which should be overwritten when implementing a customtreemodel? > > Eric > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! > Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes > sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses > http://fr.answers.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > gtkmm-list mailing list > gtkmm-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list > > ___________________________________________________________________________ Avez-vous essayé le nouveau Yahoo! Mail ? Plus rapide, plus efficace... simplement révolutionnaire ! Découvrez-le. Lien :http://fr.mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
