On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 14:06 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 09:49 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > >> [snip] > >> > Actually, I wonder if it is possible that gtkmm provide custom model > >> > implementation. Developer should just provide data container class > >> > derived from some Gtk::virtual-base class and reimplement methods to > >> > get/set data from/to your container by given Gtk::TreeModelPath or > >> > Gtk::TreeIter, and column index/reference, and methods to sort data if > >> > needed. Just there is too much code you should rewrite for your custom > >> > model now. > >> > >> This would be cool. It would be best to attempt it outside of gtkmm > >> first. > > > > even cooler if it actually derived from some STL abstract type, > > What kind of type do you mean exactly? Standard C++ containers are not > meant to be used as base classes. They do conform to standard > types/requirements, but I think those are just concepts rather than actual > classes.
i do this quite often actually. but what i really meant was to derive from the abstract classes behind the instances. e.g. Sequence, Container etc. rather than vector, list. these are real classes i believe. _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
