>> > even cooler if it actually derived from some STL abstract type, >> >> What kind of type do you mean exactly? Standard C++ containers are not >> meant to be used as base classes. They do conform to standard >> types/requirements, but I think those are just concepts rather than >> actual >> classes. > > i do this quite often actually. but what i really meant was to derive > from the abstract classes behind the instances. e.g. Sequence, Container > etc. rather than vector, list. these are real classes i believe.
No, I don't think so, though it might be vendor-specific: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/latest-doxygen/classstd_1_1list.html Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
