At 2026-01-30T12:44:35-0500, Peter Schaffter wrote: > typesetting.mom uses N and P for variety (demonstrating families), > but where either is used, T is an acceptable substitute. There's no > reason to use H as the replacement. With trivial tweaks, both the > original and the Times Roman versions produce identical layouts. > > typesetting.mom currently has this: > > .ie '\*[.T]'ps' \ > .FAM N \" New Century Schoolbook family > .el .if '\*[.T]'pdf' \ > .FAM U-N > > Is replacing the whole block (and the corresponding block for P) with > > .ie F NR .FAM N > .el .FAM T > > sufficient,
Yes, to the best of my knowledge. > or do '\*[.T]'ps' and '\*[.T]'pdf' still need to be handled > separately? I don't think so. grops doesn't support multiple foundries, but if you don't need to specify a foundry (to get the URW versions' increased glyph coverage, say), there should be no difference. Regards, Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
