On Friday, 30 January 2026 17:44:35 GMT Peter Schaffter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2026, Deri via GNU roff typesetting system discussion wrote: > > > If Peter's designed his page layouts flexibly enough that Helvetica > > > would look (about) as attractive as New Century Schoolbook, then I > > > reckon that might work.[1] We could then rip out the conditional > > > bracketing generation of the "typesetting.pdf" target. > > > > That's for Peter to decide. I am still seeing build issues. :-( > > typesetting.mom uses N and P for variety (demonstrating families), > but where either is used, T is an acceptable substitute. There's no > reason to use H as the replacement. With trivial tweaks, both the > original and the Times Roman versions produce identical layouts. > > typesetting.mom currently has this: > > .ie '\*[.T]'ps' \ > .FAM N \" New Century Schoolbook family > .el .if '\*[.T]'pdf' \ > .FAM U-N > > Is replacing the whole block (and the corresponding block for P) with > > .ie F NR .FAM N > .el .FAM T > > sufficient, or do '\*[.T]'ps' and '\*[.T]'pdf' still need to be > handled separately?
No need 'F NR' will always be true with -Tps output. Cheers Deri
