On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 6:27 AM G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dave Kemper's done some solid QA work that should avoid > embarrassment in groff 1.24.0.rc1.
Thanks! But so that the record's not overstated: It's great that groff has hundreds of regression tests now. But a problem like the .hys request failing to work altogether (http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66723) reveals that there are still gaps in that coverage (though .hys itself is one less gap now). A focused QA effort would attack those gaps. That's not something I have the time to take on. I'm merely reporting issues I'm finding in my normal usage of groff. *My* normal usage may include underused requests like .hys, but there are huge swaths of groff's capabilities that I never touch, so my test coverage is nowhere near comprehensive.
