i wrote: |Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> wrote: ||Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:19:21PM +0200: ... ||P.S. ||Only bacause i'm replying anyway and it's just five lines: | |Sure. | ||> .Op : Ns Fl c Ar cc-addr Ns \&: ||> .Fl S Ar var Ns Op Ns = Ns Ar value Ns || ||That's full of cargo cult, things are actually much simpler ||even for describing such unusually complicated syntax: || ||.Oo : Ns Fl c Ar cc-addr : Oc ||.Eo [: Fl c Ar cc-addr Ec :] | | .Op : Ns Fl c Ar cc-addr Ns \&: | .Eo [: Fl c Ar cc-addr Ns :] Ec | .Oo : Ns Fl c Ar cc-addr : Oc | |I would like the last one best, if the Ns could go from the front.
Actually i now see it was on purpose: with .Oo .. .Oc and without the .Ns stuff there may appear linebreaks inside an option, which i wanted to avoid. --steffen
