At 2017-04-26T09:27:56-0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > It seems to me that b) is fine, a) is very problematic because it > > severely harms portability, > > You're making a testable assertion here. > > 1. Portability is not harmed if extended man macros are inlined in pages > where portability to legacy systems is desired. > 2. All *roff/man processors generate output. These outputs can be > prepared.
s/pre/com/ Rather regrettable thinko, there. > I am not interested in portability problems to platforms that do not > exist in the real world. > > I am prepared to measure the impact of my proposals. Regards, Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
