> Adding .PGFORM is fine, but I would prefer just having .ll work like it > does on groff. This way the original docs work and produce as expected.
.PGFORM is already implemented but not committed yet. Do you know how .ll works in groff's MM? It is not documented. You know how it works for your special test (or the documents you have). It may even change from day to day and if it doesn't work tomorrow it is not a bug. When you read the MM documentation in DWB3.3 you find the requests which are compatible with MM. It is written there that it is not recommended to use any other request. --Carsten
