On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 3:52 PM, <carsten.ku...@arcor.de> wrote: > ... > > The interface to .ll is \nW or .PGFORM. At first my plan was to implement > .PGFORM. But *maybe* using W like MS's LL could also make sense. But for > compatibility with groff .PGFORM should be prefered. (?) >
Adding .PGFORM is fine, but I would prefer just having .ll work like it does on groff. This way the original docs work and produce as expected. Thanks! Blake McBride
