Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>: > > > groff to XML to HTML via doclifter produces better HTML than any of > > the direct groff -> HTML tools. > > Sadly, this is true. grohtml would need a big hug with much love to > grow up, but currently nobody really takes care of it.
The problem is fundamental - a good conversion needs structural
analysis as good as doclifter's, which is *hard*.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
