>> I consider the groff mailing as a kind of archive which collects >> useful tips regarding the troff suite. Your tar bundle is part of >> that bundle. > > I appreciate that. But I don't think that it would inspire people to > write directly to the archive.
Well, yes. Material like your bundle should be available more easily. A longer time ago I've started to collect contributions at http://groff.ffii.org/groff/contrib/ and right now I've added it to http://groff.ffii.org/groff/contrib/documentation/ps-in-groff/ Sorry for the delay of three years... >> Unfortunately, its importance for GNU documentation is zero. >> Officially, the GNU people prefer the texinfo documentation system. > > Werner, my point is: why is it zero for them? Because Stallman has decided to use texinfo as the official GNU documentation tool. The importance of GNU roff itself is acknowledged, but it is not as important as, say, gcc. >> Because it's just me who works on groff from time to time, noone >> else. And I have a lot of other things to do. > > Werner, my question is not why you don't do more, but why are you > alone? Because noone steps forward and helps. Werner
