"Eric S. Raymond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-01-01 12:25 -0500:
> M Bianchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > But that form is _so_ much easier to read and understand, especially for the > > novice! That, to my mind, is the overriding goal of the exercise. > > I agree. Unfortunately, I can't fix this. If the DocBook DTD were to loosen > so this were allowed, I would support it in a heartbeat. I guess maybe you should be using the latest DocBook DTD for validation :) I'm not sure what version you're using now. Maybe DocBook 4.2 or maybe 4.1.2. Anyway, there have been a good number of changes since 4.2 was released (more than 3 years ago). While I can't off the top of my head think of any other changes that might directly affect doclifter (other than the "allow multiple Refnamediv in Refentry" change I mentioned in my earlier message), there may be some others. If the DocBook DTD packager for a distro you're testing on hasn't yet packaged 4.3 (which was released well over 2 years ago), that's pretty bad (they should actually be packaging 4.4 or 4.5). --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://www.w3.org/People/Smith/ _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
