M Bianchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This would seem be argue for structural macros. E.g. > > .SH NAME > .NamePurpose "bzip2, bunzip2" "a block-sorting file compressor, v1.0.3" > .NamePurpose "bzcat" "decompresses files to stdout" > .NamePurpose "bzip2recover" "recovers data from damaged bzip2 files"
These macros are rather superfluous as the structure is implied by the "name \- purpose" convention in the name section line anyway. Moreover, the name section is a particularly bad place to use macros as it is not only read by manual page viewers or converters, but also by indexing tools like "apropos" or "whatis" (which rely precisely on the "name \- purpose" scheme). Gunnar _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff