Gunnar Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> But I think the most important question for troff people is,
> where is a complete, high-quality converter for
>
> +-------------+/ +===========+
> | XML-DocBook |=======>| troff | ?
> +-------------+\ +===========+
>
> With <?troff .request?> processing instructions, this makes
> it possible to retain all the typographical aspects we like.
>
> XSL-FO to troff is also worth consideration.
XSL-FO to troff would be far more appropriate. XSL and troff are at about
the same level; thus, you wouldn't have to wire in all the policy/styling
decisions you would in a DocBook->troff renderer.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
