M Bianchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm beginning to think that maybe a wiki front end that yielded > XML-DocBook of the RefEntry document type could encourage keeping > lots of documentation current. The Linux Documentation Project > might find that appealing also.
Perhaps that should be a project for you! The model for it might be "How To of the Day" <http://www.wikihow.com/Main-Page> which uses an interesting combination of wiki markup and forms. (I wrote the entry on "How To Break Boards With Your Bare Hands".) > If editting XML-DocBook directly is unappealing, we need something that is. Editing XML-DocBook isn't bad at all. Its drawback is that it's not a good presentation format. The markup is too verbose and obtrusive for that. > I encourage the flat text format because sometimes things like X > fail and you want access to the documents without requiring the > fancy programs work and a flat-file editor is all you have. Agreed. Fortunately, generating flat-text from HTML-DocBook is easy. You lose a lot of structural information, but that's life... > And if noone has said it, THANK YOU for tackling the problem of adding > appropriate structure to the document base. It _has_ needed attention. You're welcome. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
