> I'm not really happy with roff2pdf. It is a poor substitute for > Keith's pdfroff script IMHO since it lacks real support for PDF > features. At least the documentation of roff2pdf should reflect that. > > Maybe the easiest solution is to make groffer call pdfroff. Another > option is to merge the functionality, making pdfroff a symlink to > roff2pdf.
You are right. I will change groffer to do this. But actually I do not have time for it. It will take several weeks. Bernd Warken _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
