Ian Lance Taylor schrieb am Dienstag, 25. August 2020 um 00:35:33 UTC+2:
> I've seen objections that a language change for generics should not
> implicitly pull in a change to non-generic code. That seems fair. It
> may be the right thing to do, but it should be justified separately.
> So we're going to start with "any" only being accepted as a type
> constraint, and we can discuss making the name available for all uses
> separately, probably on issue 33232.
>
I understand the motivation, but I hope this artificial restriction is
eventually lifted, because I find special cases and exceptions to
generality make a language more confusing to learn ("Why can I use this
here but not there, even though it's referring to the same thing?").
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/2c13095f-ccce-43cc-9e52-f3ecd0bba733n%40googlegroups.com.
