On Friday, 21 August 2020 20:15:46 UTC+2, burak serdar wrote:
>
> [...]
> I don't see why anybody would find it attractive as a return type. People
> don't use the empty interface because they like it so much, but because Go
> doesn't have parametric polymorphism / "generics" yet. There are many
> programming languages that have a named top type and it is rarely abused.
> Programmers want to write type safe code if they can.
>
> I disagree. Especially people coming from other languages with a
> strong emphasis on DRY tend to overuse interface{}, many times
> incorrectly, and generics will not fix that. "any" will make it more
> attractive, because it no longer looks like an interface. I agree that
> this is a hypothetical problem at this point without any actual
> complaints from developers. But defining an alias "any" is easy if you
> need it. Providing one predefined is endorsing its use.
>
Adopting Go because people adopted bad habits in other languages
is probably not a good idea. Fanatic DRY is a bad idea in any
language and if somebody wants to footgun himself by premature
DRY ing up he will be as able with interface{} as with any.
I find a predefined any very sensible.
V.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/ba2f8502-9586-4179-8736-dbe1b3c31ca9o%40googlegroups.com.
