Дана петак, 03. март 2017. у 00.34.39 CET, Anonymous написа: > Filip Brcic said: > > There is absolutely no way to make that functionality without > > javascript, unless you want it to look really ugly, > > If it's the cosmetics of fancy javascript frills vs. being functional, > then the answer as to which wins that contest in the GFDL: > > https://static.fsf.org/nosvn/directory/fdl-1.3-standalone.html > > (search for "simple html") > > If that should be overturned, the GFDL should be updated first, as > opposed to projects violating it.
You have a choice between: 1) HTML without JavaScript and without documentation search functionality and 2) HTML with JavaScript and with documentation search functionality where such search functionality doesn't work on text-based browsers, but everything else does. I don't see that as a choice. If you do, then you are promoting denial of service for everyone not using lynx (if I am to use your wording). As for "simple html", that needs defining. I am not sure lynx supports even div tags and it definitely doesn't support simple header/footer/nav/button/video/ article/section/... tags from simple html version 5. So, what exactly is simple html? Who defines that? If anything, html is going towards simplicity by introducing semantic tags (such as those I've mentioned), but is that simple or complex? -- GPG fingerprint: 9AFC0A4BD2CEF3D22CF6108196577BD3C105EDA4 Please read if you don't use GPG: https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
