At Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:07:36 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:54:17AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > People have mentioned several issues in GNU Mach (in particular, there > > was one good summary by Olaf, but heck if I can find it in the > > archive. Do you guys never change the subject lines?) But there was > > at least one glaring omission, and one that is in my opinion Given the > > Of course it is impossible to give a comprehensive review of all > > issues, but at least this one deserves particular mention, because it > > is so obvious. If you ever did I/O-intensive work on the Hurd, you > > know what I am talking about. > > > > GNU Mach does not have any resource accounting, and it has very poor > > resource scheduling. > > Actually, I did mention it as the very first problem, though only in one > sentence... > > Anyways, thanks for the nice summary :-) > > BTW, the message you were looking for is > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-system-discuss/2007-09/msg00071.html > > Guess how I found it? By searching for "resource" :-)
Right. That's the message. It mentions resource accounting, but not resource scheduling. Thanks, Marcus
